Bell v. Thompson
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This action was brought by Teresa Bell as special administratrix of the estate of Thomas Bell, deceased, to vacate and annul a decree of foreclosure of mortgage obtained by defendant against property of the estate of Bell, for alleged fraud in its procurement. The gravamen of the charge is, that George Staacke, while executor under the will of the estate of Bell, deceased, was likewise the agent of Louisa J. Thompson, who owned and held the mortgage and mortgage note in the sum of fifty thousand dollars upon property of the estate of Bell; that by collusive fraud upon the part of the two,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Parsons v. WeisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Collins v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Dunlap v. SteereCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Gregory v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Harnish v. BramerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Cantwell v. CantwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
- Carpenter v. SibleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Karlslyst v. FrazierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Goldberg v. Sisseton Loan & Title Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.