Legal Opinion

City of Statesville v. Bowles

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 17, 1969No. 6922SC391PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, J.

The petitioner assigns as error the admission of various evidence over its objection.

All of respondents’ witnesses testified that in their opinion the highest and best use of 21 of the 90 acres respondents contend was affected by the easement was for commercial purposes. The other 69 acres were best suited for residential purposes. The petitioner challenges their further testimony which described the accessibility of the 21 acre parcel and expressed the opinion that the location of the sewer line would prohibit grading to the depth needed in order to prepare the property for commercial…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. City of New York v. SageSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Perfecting Service Co. v. Product Development & Sales Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. MossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works Commission v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. City of Charlotte v. HeathSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Charlotte v. BMJ OF CHARLOTTE, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. DeROSSETT v. DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  3. North Carolina State Highway Commission v. Forest Lawn Cemetery, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Dolezal v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  5. Dolezal v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API