Legal Opinion

City of Charlotte v. BMJ OF CHARLOTTE, LLC

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 2009No. COA08-147PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STROUD, Judge.

This appeal addresses a counterclaim for inverse condemnation 1 filed in response to a condemnation action by the City of Charlotte. The gravamen of the counterclaim is that plaintiffs use of a railroad right of way that runs over defendants’ land is in derogation of defendants’ rights as the holder of the underlying fee. Defendants offer two different legal theories as to why they are entitled to compensation for use of the railroad right of way. Defendants’ first theory is that any rights which might have previously existed to use the railroad right of way have reverted to the…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. State v. BindykeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Department of Transportation v. RoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Railroad v. OliveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Hodges v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Wilson v. Batten Family, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  2. Department of Transportation v. WebsterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. Abbott v. AbernathyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2023
  4. Alston v. JacoxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2026
  5. Brown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API