Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dolezal v. City of Cedar Rapids

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 3, 1973No. 55403Published

1DissentMcCORMICK, Justice

I respectfully dissent from Division III and the result.

I cannot join the majority in approving the failure of a trial court to define for a jury the nature and scope of the taking in an eminent domain case in the face of requested instructions properly explaining it. This approval is particularly disturbing in the present case where the taking is unusual and highly technical.

Trial court’s refusal of the requested instructions violates “the universally accepted rule that where requested instructions state correct rules of law and the substance of the request is not covered by the instructions…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Law Ex Rel. Law v. HemmingsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  2. Welton v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  3. Lehman v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  4. City of Oakland v. NutterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. City of Statesville v. BowlesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API