Perfecting Service Co. v. Product Development & Sales Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
There are more than 200 pages of evidence in the record. A detailed review of the evidence is not essential for decision of the questions raised on this appeal. General summaries of the contentions of the parties, which find support in their evidentiary offerings, will suffice.
Plaintiff’s contentions: When requested by defendant to manufacture the Fan-O-Matic, plaintiff advised that it had had no experience in the automotive field. To make the type of instrument defendant wanted die casting was necessary, and this process of manufacture was outside plaintiff's usual field of operation.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Wyatt v. North Carolina Equipment CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Tillis v. Calvine Cotton Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Tuite v. UNION PACIFIC STAGESOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Summerlin v. Carolina & North-Western RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Lieberman v. . Templar Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- State v. SilhanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Spartan Leasing Inc. v. PollardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Pleasant Valley Promenade v. Lechmere, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Cogdill v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. SparksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.