North Carolina State Highway Commission v. Forest Lawn Cemetery, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BROCK, Judge.
Defendants assign as error the admission of evidence of the purchase price of the entire property. Their argument is that it was error to admit evidence of the purchase price, because there was evidence that between the time the property was purchased and the time of taking there had been changes in the nature of other property in the immediate vicinity of defendants’. However, the record on appeal does not give foundation to defendants’ contention. We note that defendants’ evidence, through Mr. DeBruhl, Mr. Liles, and Mr. Gooch, tends to show that all changes in the nature of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State Highway Commission v. MatthisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
- City of Statesville v. BowlesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- North Carolina State Highway Commission v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
3Cited by2 opinions
- Seaman v. McQueenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Shepard v. Drucker & FalkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983