Legal Opinion
Baker v. Varser
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided May 19, 1954No. 459PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPaekeb, J.
This case was predicated, and tried in the former appeal on the theory that the plaintiff had shown by evidence compliance with Rule Five of the Rules Governing Admission to Practice of Law in North Carolina. These rules are printed in 208 N.C. 857, et seq.; in 221 N.C. 608, et seq.; and in G. S. N. C., Vol. 4, p. 65, et seq. In his brief of 39 pages in the former appeal, he did not question the constitutionality of the statute giving authority to the defendant Board of Law Examiners to make Rule Five.
We held in our former opinion that there was in effect at that time no provision for an…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Social Security Board v. NierotkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- National Labor Relations Board v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Bradwell v. StateSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- In Matter of RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Keenan v. Board of Law Examiners of State of NCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1970
- State v. MemsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Penland v. BIRD COAL COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Smith v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.