Penland v. BIRD COAL COMPANY
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
Decision here turns on whether there is competent evidence to support the Industrial Commission’s findings that the plaintiff has suffered temporary disability and partial loss of earning capacity as set out in findings of fact numbers 3 and 5.
Under the Workmen’s Compensation Act the Industrial Commission has the exclusive duty and authority to find the facts relative to controverted claims, and its findings of fact, except with respect to jurisdictional findings (Aycock v. Cooper, 202 N.C. 500, 163 S.E. 569), are conclusive on appeal, both to the Superior Court and in the Supreme Court, when…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Greene v. SpiveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Thomason v. Red Bird Cab Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Aycock v. . CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Baker v. VarserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Lewter v. Abercrombie Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Long v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. WadeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Lockwood v. McCaskillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Nello L. Teer Co. v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. FranksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.