Legal Opinion
Social Security Board v. Nierotko
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 25, 1946No. 318PublishedCited by 392 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reed
A problem as to whether “back pay,” which is granted to an employee under the National Labor Relations Act, shall be treated as “wages” under the Social Security Act comes before us on this record. If such “back pay” is a wage payment, there is also at issue the proper allocation of such sums to the quarters of coverage for which the “back pay” was allowed.
The respondent, Joseph Nierotko, was found by the National Labor Relations Board to have been wrongfully, discharged for union activity by his employer, the Ford Motor Company, and was reinstated by that Board in his employment with…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by392 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Batterton v. FrancisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
387 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.