Keenan v. Board of Law Examiners of State of NC
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CRAVEN, Circuit Judge:
The plaintiffs James E. Keenan, Margaret Burnham, and Loren Mitchell bring this class action seeking a declaratory judgment declaring unconstitutional and an injunction preventing enforcement of Rule VI(6) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Practice of Law in the State of North Carolina promulgated by the North Carolina Board of Law Examiners. We hold Rule VI(6) to be unconstitutional because it creates an unreasonable, arbitrary classification, unnecessarily burdens the plaintiffs’ right to travel, and arbitrarily denies the plaintiffs an opportunity to practice…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Zwickler v. KootaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- John Doe v. E. E. PringleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- Catherine Cole v. Housing Authority of the City of NewportCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
- Clifton C. Tang v. Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court, First Department, and Honorable Justices Aron SteuerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- Alva Owen Hawkins v. Honorable Joseph R. Moss, Chief JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
- Raffaelli v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.