Legal Opinion
State v. Mems
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided July 31, 1972No. 2PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*665LAKE, Justice.
The defendant has argued upon his appeal eight assignments of error. We have considered each carefully and find no merit in any of them. The only one meriting detailed discussion is that the trial judge erred in failing to grant the defendant’s motion to suppress the in-court identifications of the defendant by Mrs. Boras and Mrs. Williams.
In his brief, the defendant asserts:
“Under North Carolina law in effect at the time of the present lineup the defendant was clearly, unequivocally entitled to the services of counsel at the lineup. He was guaranteed this right by Article 36 of…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. HesterTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. Van McDougallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. ThackerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.