Espinosa v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
J. HARVEY HUDSON, Justice.
Appellant, Patrick Isaac Espinosa, was found guilty by a jury of murder; his punishment was assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for forty-five years. In three issues for review, he asserts: (1) the trial court committed harmful error by refusing to allow his counsel to make an opening statement; (2) the trial court erred in instructing the jury about good conduct time; and (3) the parole charge mandated by Article 37.07, Section 4 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure is unconstitutional because it contains erroneous information regarding good…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ladd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Cagle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Edwards v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Luquis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Felan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Laney v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
- Phat Van Bui v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
- Washington v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.