Legal Opinion

Moore v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 24, 1993No. 819-92PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

MEYERS, Judge.

A jury convicted Appellant of aggravated robbery and assessed his punishment at twenty years imprisonment. The Dallas Court of Appeals reversed Appellant’s conviction. Moore v. State, 829 S.W.2d 390 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1992).

The State’s petition was granted to determine whether the 1987 amendment to art. 36.01 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure,1 which added subsection (b), affords criminal defendants the right to make an opening statement prior to presentation of the State’s case when the State does not make an opening…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Dunn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Norton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Penry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  2. Staley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Beedy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  4. Tucker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  5. State v. ColyandroCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API