Moore v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
MEYERS, Judge.
A jury convicted Appellant of aggravated robbery and assessed his punishment at twenty years imprisonment. The Dallas Court of Appeals reversed Appellant’s conviction. Moore v. State, 829 S.W.2d 390 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1992).
The State’s petition was granted to determine whether the 1987 amendment to art. 36.01 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure,1 which added subsection (b), affords criminal defendants the right to make an opening statement prior to presentation of the State’s case when the State does not make an opening…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Dunn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Norton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Penry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Staley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Beedy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Tucker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- State v. ColyandroCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.