Luquis v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COCHRAN, J.,
delivered the opinion of the Court.,
joined by KELLER, P.J., MEYERS, KEASLER, HERVEY, and HOLCOMB, JJ.
Appellant challenges the trial court’s submission of the statutorily-required parole law instruction at the punishment stage. Appellant argues that, because he is not eligible for release on mandatory supervision, the trial judge erred in giving the jury the instruction concerning “good conduct time.” Moreover, because this portion of the charge does not apply to him, appellant contends that informing the jury about “good conduct time” violated his due process rights.…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Boyde v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Victor v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by302 opinions
- Ross v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Peraza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
- McQuarrie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
- Sanders v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Hooper v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
297 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.