Martinez v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
KIDD, Justice.
Appellant Steven Martinez was convicted of aggravated robbery and the jury assessed his punishment at ninety-eight years’ confinement. Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 29.03(a)(1),(2) (West 1994). He contends that the parole law instruction is misleading and therefore unconstitutional. We will affirm the conviction.
Background
Appellant does not claim either legal or factual insufficiency of the evidence, thus no extensive review of the facts of the ease is necessary. To put the case in context, and because we will consider the facts of the offense in a harm analysis, we note that the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Abdnor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- French v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Luquis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- State v. BallmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Jimenez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Chimney v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999
- Cagle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.