Legal Opinion

Phat Van Bui v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided January 24, 2002No. 01-00-00507-CRPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EN BANC OPINION

JENNINGS, Justice.

A jury found appellant, Phat Van Bui, guilty of aggravated robbery and assessed punishment at 15 years in prison with a $10,000 fíne. Appellant brings five points of error and challenges the effectiveness of his trial counsel, the factual sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury’s verdict, and the admission of an extraneous offense over his objection. He further challenges the constitutionality of the parole charge to the jury, required by article 37.07 section 4(a) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, as applied to criminal defendants whose actual…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  4. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  5. Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Luquis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  2. Wheeler v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Bolden v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
  4. Hooper v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
  5. Fluor Enterprises, Inc. v. Conex International Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API