Cagle v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REHEARING
TERRIE LIVINGSTON, Justice.
We withdraw our March 2, 2000 opinion and judgment and substitute the following, modifying our analysis regarding the charge at punishment to address appellant’s second ground on motion for rehearing. Appellant’s first ground on motion for rehearing is denied.
Introduction
Appellant Ronnie Bruce Cagle appeals his conviction and sentence for aggravated sexual assault of a child under age fourteen and indecency with a child by contact. Appellant raises six issues, complaining of various trial court errors, rights violations, and ineffective…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Dowthitt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Luquis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Sanders v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Loun v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
- Donoho v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Hill v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.