Legal Opinion

Stovall v. Sally Salmon Seafood

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1988No. WCB 84-13447, 85-01254; CA A38730; SC S33962PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*27LENT, J.

The first issue is which of two successive employers is responsible for payment of workers’ compensation for claimant’s occupational disease, carpal tunnel syndrome. Working conditions at both employers could have caused the disease. Claimant first became disabled from the disease while working for the second employer and first sought medical treatment during that second employment. She would not have required surgery except for the second employment. We hold that the second employer is responsible.

The second issue is whether the later employer can avoid payment of compensation under…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bauman v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Matter of Compensation of BrackeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Wiggins v. Barrett & Associates, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Sahnow v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Boise Cascade Corp. v. StarbuckOregon Supreme Court · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Saif Corp. v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Day v. Advanced M & D Sales, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc. v. DelgiaccoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  5. Cascade Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API