Legal Opinion

Saif Corp. v. Allen

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1994No. WCB 91-09837; CA A76538; SC S40951PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*195DURHAM, J.

This workers’ compensation case presents two issues: (1) When the three-judge panel of the Court of Appeals issued a majority opinion, a concurring opinion, and a dissenting opinion, did that court comply with ORS 2.570(4), which requires the “concurrence of two judges * * * to pronounce judgment”? (2) Does ORS 656.386(1), set out below, allow an award of attorney fees when an employer or insurer denies a claim for medical services, but does not deny expressly the compensability of, or its responsibility for, the claimant’s injury or condition? We hold: (1) The Court of Appeals…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Bauman v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Stephens v. BohlmanOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Cutright v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Halperin v. PittsOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Engweiler v. PerssonOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. Godfrey v. Fred Meyer StoresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. Moody v. Oregon Community Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API