Saif Corp. v. Allen
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*195DURHAM, J.
This workers’ compensation case presents two issues: (1) When the three-judge panel of the Court of Appeals issued a majority opinion, a concurring opinion, and a dissenting opinion, did that court comply with ORS 2.570(4), which requires the “concurrence of two judges * * * to pronounce judgment”? (2) Does ORS 656.386(1), set out below, allow an award of attorney fees when an employer or insurer denies a claim for medical services, but does not deny expressly the compensability of, or its responsibility for, the claimant’s injury or condition? We hold: (1) The Court of Appeals…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Bauman v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Stephens v. BohlmanOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Cutright v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Halperin v. PittsOregon Supreme Court · 2012
- Engweiler v. PerssonOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Godfrey v. Fred Meyer StoresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Moody v. Oregon Community Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.