Day v. Advanced M & D Sales, Inc.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.
This case requires us to decide whether plaintiff is estopped from filing a complaint alleging common-law negligence and violations of the Employer Liability Law, ORS 654.305 to 654.335 (1999), after he applied for and received workers’ compensation benefits. On defendant’s motion for summary judgment, the trial court concluded that equitable and judicial estoppel prohibited plaintiff from denying that he was a covered worker under defendant’s workers’ compensation insurance and that the exclusive remedy provision of the Workers’ Compensation Law, ORS 656.018, barred plaintiffs claims.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Harriet Rissetto v. Plumbers and Steamfitters Local 343, a Business Entity, Form Unknown, Michael Beavers and Does 1-25, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Hampton Tree Farms, Inc. v. JewettOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Stella A. Dush v. Appleton Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Oregon v. Portland Gen. Elec. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908
- S-W Floor Cover Shop v. National Council on Compensation InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Vukanovich v. KineCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Global Executive Management Solutions, Inc. v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 2017
- Brockway v. Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- DCIPA, LLC v. Lucile Slater Packard Children's Hospital at StanfordDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2011
- Glover v. Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.