Mail v. M. R. Smith Lumber & Shingle Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.
This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by a child three years of age while he was playing with pike poles on a walkway of defendants millpond. The complaint is based on the doctrine of attractive nuisance. The trial court sustained a demurrer to the plaintiffs’ amended complaint and entered judgment dismissing the action.
The defendant lumber mill maintained on its premises an artificial open millpond. It was unguarded and without warning signs at the time the minor child was injured. On the bank of the pond, there was a deck from which a walkway extended to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schock v. Ringling Bros. Etc.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
- Barnhart v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
- Meyer v. General Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955
- Smith v. McGoldrick Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
- Anderson v. ReederWashington Supreme Court · 1953
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ochampaugh v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- Sherman v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- McDermott v. KaczmarekCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- Winter v. MacKnerWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- Gubalke Ex Rel. Gubalke v. Estate of AnthesNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.