Legal Opinion

Barnhart v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1916No. 12866PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Bell, J., entered November 17, 1914, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for wrongful death.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The plaintiff brought this action for the purpose of recovering damages for the death of his son, a child eight years of age. The cause was tried to a jury. At the conclusion of all the evidence, the defendant challenged the sufficiency thereof, and moved for a directed verdict. This motion was denied. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $650. Judgment being entered upon the verdict, the defendant appeals.

The facts briefly stated are: During the latter part of the year 1911, the appellant railway company was complet*305ing the construction of its branch line from Cedar…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. City of Pekin v. McMahonIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Peters v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Stendal v. BoydSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Degel v. Majestic Mobile Manor, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. McCleod v. Tri-State Milling Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Schock v. Ringling Bros. Etc.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Ochampaugh v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Bicandi v. Boise Payette Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1935

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API