Meyer v. General Electric Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.
We must decide whether a commercially operated ditch fifteen feet in average width with domestic water running in it from two to three-and-one-half feet deep, is an attractive nuisance along the unfenced portion of its course through the city of Richland.
At about noon, on August 28, 1953, plaintiff’s two-year- and-eight-months old son left his home. He was unattended and on a tricycle. He traveled over two thousand feet to Thayer drive, a hard-surfaced thoroughfare parallel to and about two hundred feet distant from the ditch in question, which was unfenced and easily accessible to him.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bjork v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- McCabe v. American Woolen Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1903
- Somerfield v. Land & Power Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
3Cited by16 opinions
- Degel v. Majestic Mobile Manor, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1996
- Degel v. Majestic Mobile Manor, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1996
- Ochampaugh v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- Sherman v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- McDermott v. KaczmarekCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.