Legal Opinion

Meyer v. General Electric Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1955No. 33107PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.

We must decide whether a commercially operated ditch fifteen feet in average width with domestic water running in it from two to three-and-one-half feet deep, is an attractive nuisance along the unfenced portion of its course through the city of Richland.

At about noon, on August 28, 1953, plaintiff’s two-year- and-eight-months old son left his home. He was unattended and on a tricycle. He traveled over two thousand feet to Thayer drive, a hard-surfaced thoroughfare parallel to and about two hundred feet distant from the ditch in question, which was unfenced and easily accessible to him.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bjork v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. McCabe v. American Woolen Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1903
  3. Somerfield v. Land & Power Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Degel v. Majestic Mobile Manor, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Degel v. Majestic Mobile Manor, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Ochampaugh v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Sherman v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. McDermott v. KaczmarekCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API