Legal Opinion

Smith v. McGoldrick Lumber Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1923No. 17758PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

— In an action for damages in the sum of $20,150, for the drowning of their eleven-year-old son, a verdict for $1,000 having been awarded by the jury, was set aside by the trial court on motion of the respondent for judgment n. o. v.

The basis of the cause of action of appellants was that respondents maintained a dangerous, attractive and alluring nuisance, consisting of a mill pond within the city of Spokane, which was covered by a carpet of logs, to and upon which children of immature years were attracted to play, and which constituted a great danger; that the pond and the logs were not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barnhart v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Akin v. Bradley Engineering & Machinery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Thompson v. Illinois Central R.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Bjork v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Heva v. Seattle School District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Schock v. Ringling Bros. Etc.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. State Ex Rel. Kleczka v. ContaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Ochampaugh v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Bicandi v. Boise Payette Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Reardon v. Spring Valley Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API