Schock v. Ringling Bros. Etc.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.
Amos D. Schock brought this action, on his own behalf, and as guardian ad litem of his three minor daughters, Jacqualine, Evangeline, and Marian, to recover damages resulting from injuries sustained by the three children while watching the unloading of defendant’s circus within a railroad yard in Yakima. A trial to the court, sitting without a jury, resulted in findings of fact in favor of plaintiffs in varying amounts. From a judgment entered in accordance with the findings, defendant appealed.
On August 23, 1939, at about 2:30 a. m., appellant’s-circus arrived in Yakima, Washington, by way…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Barnhart v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
- Akin v. Bradley Engineering & Machinery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
- Olson v. Gill Home Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
- Heller v. New York, N. H. & H. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Potts v. AmisWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Kalinowski v. Y.W.C.A.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
- Upchurch v. HubbardWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- Ochampaugh v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- Dotson v. HaddockWashington Supreme Court · 1955
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.