Legal Opinion

Sherman v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1960No. 35018PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

This action was brought on behalf of Gregory Sherman, a three-year-old child (hereinafter referred to as respondent), to recover damages for injuries sustained by him on appellant’s premises at the Diablo dam site located in the mountains in Whatcom county.

The nature of the action is more fully described in the complaint, which alleges, in part:

“HI. That at the power project maintained by the defendant at Diablo on the Skagit River in the State of Washington, the defendant city maintains housing and other premises in the vicinity of the power house for the use of employees of the City on the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Johnston v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. DeKoning v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Schock v. Ringling Bros. Etc.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Roedder v. LindsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Rosenkranz v. Lindell Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Tincani v. Inland Empire Zoological SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Washburn v. Beatt Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Potts v. AmisWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Lords v. Northern Automotive Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  5. Ochampaugh v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1979

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API