Legal Opinion
Biglow v. Boeing Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided July 3, 2001No. 00-2370-KHVPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Kevin Lee Biglow and Henry F. Butler bring employment discrimination and retaliation claims against The Boeing Company under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. as amended (“Title VII”) and the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983. This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion To Sever Plaintiffs’ Claims (Doc. #21) filed March 2, 2001. For reasons stated below, the Court overrules defendant’s motion.
Defendant urges the Court to sever plaintiffs’ claims under Rule 21,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Simms v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Mental Health & Substance Abuse ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Nathaniel MOSLEY Et Al., Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION Et Al., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- K-B Trucking Company and Keith Collins, Cross-Appellants v. Riss International Corporation and World Leasing, Inc., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Coffin v. South Carolina Department of Social ServicesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- DirecTV, Inc. v. HoseyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- Sprint Communications Co. v. Theglobe.com, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2006
- DIRECTV, Inc. v. BarrettDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- Finke v. Ensign Group, Inc, TheDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2019
- Hampton v.SnapCall Investments, Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.