Legal Opinion

Hampton v.SnapCall Investments, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided March 5, 2021No. 4:20-cv-00472Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA JOYCE HAMPTON, individually and ) as surviving spouse of Harry Payne Hampton ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 20-CV-0472-CVE-CDL ) SNAPCALL INVESTMENTS, INC. ) D/B/A/ RIGHT AT HOME, ) a foreign corporation; ) JANE DOE, an Oklahoma citizen; ) RIGHT-AT-HOME, LLC; ) RIGHT-AT-HOME, INC.; ) ) Defendants. ) OPINION AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court for consideration of plaintiff Joyce Hampton’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint and add parties (Dkt. # 19). Defendant, SnapCall Investments, Inc. (“SnapCall”),…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Minter v. Prime Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  4. Robert H. E. Frank, Jerry D. Mooberry, Tyrone G. Moreno v. U.S. West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  5. Hardin v. Manitowoc-Forsythe Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API