Hoch v. Duluth Brewing & Malting Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Plaintiff appeals from the order sustaining a demurrer to his complaint. The main facts alleged in the complaint may be summarized thus:
From 1900 to 1922 plaintiff was the principal stockholder, the president, the general manager, and a member of the board of directors of the defendant, a corporation engaged in the manufacture and sale of malt beverages; that T. F. Mackmiller, a customer of defendant, was indebted to it in a large amount in 1905 and unable to pay the same; that as active manager of defendant’s business plaintiff secured this indebtedness by obtaining a conveyance from…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Truesdale v. Philadelphia Trust, Safe Deposit & InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Seibert v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- First National Bank v. TenneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892
- Guirney v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Henderson v. EckernSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Shair-A-Plane v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Adams v. North Range Iron Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Drake-Jones Co. v. DrogsethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Hollandale Marketing Ass'n v. GoematSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955