Legal Opinion

Adams v. North Range Iron Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 23, 1934No. 29,730PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLT, Justice.

A demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and plaintiff appeals.

The facts alleged may appear sufficiently for an understanding of the legal question raised from .this condensed statement: Plaintiff, D. R. McLennan, and Ward Ames, on and prior to February á, 1919, were jointly interested in a lease of a tract of land in Crow Wing county, this state, containing iron ore, on which they had done some exploring and drilling; and on the date mentioned they incorporated defendant, assigned the lease to it, becoming the owners of substantially all of its capital stock. Plaintiff became…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Powell v. TrusteesNew York Supreme Court · 1822
  2. First National Bank v. TenneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892
  3. Du Puy v. Crucible Steel Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Hoch v. Duluth Brewing & Malting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  5. Clark v. JonesTennessee Supreme Court · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Basmajian v. Christie, Manson & Woods International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  2. Johnson Realty v. BenderColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Minneapolis Police Officers Federation v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  4. In re the Occupational License of HaymesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API