Adams v. North Range Iron Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
HOLT, Justice.
A demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and plaintiff appeals.
The facts alleged may appear sufficiently for an understanding of the legal question raised from .this condensed statement: Plaintiff, D. R. McLennan, and Ward Ames, on and prior to February á, 1919, were jointly interested in a lease of a tract of land in Crow Wing county, this state, containing iron ore, on which they had done some exploring and drilling; and on the date mentioned they incorporated defendant, assigned the lease to it, becoming the owners of substantially all of its capital stock. Plaintiff became…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Powell v. TrusteesNew York Supreme Court · 1822
- First National Bank v. TenneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892
- Du Puy v. Crucible Steel Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1923
- Hoch v. Duluth Brewing & Malting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Clark v. JonesTennessee Supreme Court · 1886
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Basmajian v. Christie, Manson & Woods International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Johnson Realty v. BenderColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
- Minneapolis Police Officers Federation v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- In re the Occupational License of HaymesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988