Truesdale v. Philadelphia Trust, Safe Deposit & Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Hennepin county, referred by order of court to W. E. Hale, Esq., as referee, to try and determine the issues and to report a judgment thereon. The referee found in favor of defendants. From an order, Elliott, J., denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover the value of his services as an attorney. The cause of action as set forth in his complaint is substantially as follows: That between July 1, 1888, and June 1, 1893, the plaintiff, at the request and for the benefit of the defendants, performed certain services as an attorney at law, and expended certain money, in and about certain litigation involving the foreclosure of a certain mortgage against the Minneapolis and St. Louis Railway Company, and in and about conducting certain litigation concerning the foreclosure of certain mortgages and trust…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Taylor v. Davis' AdministratrixSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Robertson v. BullionsNew York Supreme Court · 1850
- Johnson v. LemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- Seibert v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Rensselaer & Saratoga Rail Road v. Miller & KnappSupreme Court of Vermont · 1874
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re Trusteeship Under Last Will of RosenfeldtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Truesdale v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- McGovern v. BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Riedell v. StuartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Griggs v. NadeauCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.