Legal Opinion

Hollandale Marketing Ass'n v. Goemat

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 24, 1955No. 36,529PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas Gallagher, Justice.

Action to recover money advanced by plaintiff, Hollandale Marketing Association, a co-operative marketing corporation, as agent for defendants in settlement of defendants’ liability on certain written contracts for the sale and delivery to two Chicago produce firms of 20 carloads of XT. S. No. 1 grade “Yellow Globe” onions. The trial court made findings and ordered judgment in defendants’ favor in substance determining that the settlements made by plaintiff with the Chicago firms were unauthorized by defendants. This is an appeal from the trial court’s order denying…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mueller v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  2. National Pole & Treating Co. v. GilkeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  3. Wallace v. Joseph Dixon Crucible Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  4. State Ex Rel. Cairney v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. Drake-Jones Co. v. DrogsethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Minnesota Farm Bureau Marketing Corp. v. North Dakota Agricultural Marketing Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  2. Minnesota Farm Bureau Marketing Corporation v. North Dakota Agricultural Marketing Association, Inc., a North Dakota Corporation, Etc. v. Richard A. LarsenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  3. Art Goebel, Inc. v. Northern Suburban Agencies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API