Legal Opinion

Drake-Jones Co. v. Drogseth

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 3, 1933No. 29,107PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILTON, Justice.

Appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

Plaintiff is a stock brokerage concern. The transaction hereinafter referred to was conducted for it by its vice president, A. M. Drake. It involved the purchase by plaintiff of 50 shares of the capital stock of the First Bank Stock Corporation for $2,787.50 under an order given therefor by defendant, who later refused to take the stock as tendered. Plaintiff sold the stock on May 19, 1931, for $975 ($19.50 per share) with a resulting net loss of $2,011.25.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Taussig v. . HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Nygaard v. Maeser Fur Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  3. Hoch v. Duluth Brewing & Malting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  4. Schrack v. McKnightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
  5. Goldsmith, Myer & Lobdell, Inc. v. AdlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cecka v. Beckman & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Rude v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. R. Baruch and Company v. SpringerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. Hollandale Marketing Ass'n v. GoematSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API