Legal Opinion

Krchnak v. Fulton

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided November 1, 1988No. 07-88-0124-CVPublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYD, Justice.

Appellant George Krchnak brings this appeal from a default summary judgment. In that judgment, appellee Joe Kirk Fulton was awarded $22,820 for boarding care, stud fees, and veterinary services rendered to appellant’s mare named Miss Mighty Moon, plus $2,500 attorney’s fees. In the judgment, appellee was also awarded a foreclosure of stablemen’s lien. We reverse and remand.

In six points, appellant argues the trial court erred in (1) overruling his motion to transfer venue; (2) holding a hearing on appellee’s motion for summary judgment with only six days notice to defense…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Cliff v. HugginsTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Ivy v. CarrellTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Lopez v. LopezTexas Supreme Court · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. Cimarron Hydrocarbons Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Limestone Construction, Inc. v. Summit Commercial Industrial Properties, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
  3. Southern County Mutual Insurance Co. v. Ochoa, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
  4. KW Construction v. Stephens & Sons Concrete Contractors, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
  5. Procter v. Foxmeyer Drug Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API