Legal Opinion

Carpenter v. Cimarron Hydrocarbons Corp.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 2002No. 01-0002PublishedCited by 387 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Neill

in which Chief Justice PHILLIPS, Justice ENOCH, Justice OWEN, Justice HANKINSON and Justice JEFFERSON joined.

We grant Cimarron Hydrocarbon Corporation’s motion for rehearing. We withdraw our opinion and judgment of July 3, 2002, and substitute the following in its place.

In this case, we decide the review standards governing certain pre- and post-summary judgment rulings. Defendants in the underlying case each filed summary-judgment motions to which the plaintiff failed to timely respond. Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file a late response and a motion to continue the scheduled…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Ivy v. CarrellTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Stelly v. PapaniaTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Sharp v. Broadway National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by387 opinions

  1. In the Interest of J.T.G., H.N.M., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003
  2. Wheeler v. GreenTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Taylor v. Texas Department of Protective & Regulatory Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
  4. Dolgencorp of Texas, Inc. v. LermaTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  5. In the Interest of M.N.Texas Supreme Court · 2008

382 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API