Legal Opinion

Procter v. Foxmeyer Drug Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided August 31, 1994No. 05-93-00470-CVPublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LAGARDE, Justice.

This ease presents the issue of whether a corporation, unhappy with an obligation that it voluntarily assumed by an agreement it drafted, may avoid that obligation under the public policy preventing unreasonable restraints on alienation of property. We conclude that it may.

Doak C. Procter, III appeals from a summary judgment declaring that his contractual option to purchase real property from appel-lee Foxmeyer Drug Company is an unreasonable restraint on alienation. In four points of error, Procter complains that (i) as a matter of law the option is not an…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. MMP, Ltd. v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Gaines v. HammanTexas Supreme Court · 1962

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Navasota Resources, L.P. v. First Source Texas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
  2. Augusta Court Co-Owners' Ass'n v. Levin, Roth & Kasner, P.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  3. Hoffman v. L & M ARTSDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2011
  4. Michael D. Lee v. the Rogers Agency, C. Michael Rogers, and New York Life Insurance Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2016
  5. Hicks v. Castille, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2010

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API