Legal Opinion
Ivy v. Carrell
Texas Supreme Court
Decided October 5, 1966No. A-11470PublishedCited by 399 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CALVERT, Chief Justice.
Cecil Carrell was plaintiff, and Marshall Ivy was defendant in the trial court, and they will be so referred to in this opinion. The purpose of Carrell’s suit was to have a deed, executed and delivered by him to Ivy, declared to be a mortgage, and to remove cloud from title to the land therein described.
Carrell’s suit was filed on June 12, 1963, and an answer was filed by Ivy on June 26, 1963. An amended petition was filed on July 8, 1963, and an amended answer and a motion to dismiss was filed on February 11, 1964. On January 4, 1965, the case was set for trial on…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
- Hanks v. RosserTexas Supreme Court · 1964
- Freeman v. FreemanTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- Holliday v. HollidayTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Humprey v. HarrellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by399 opinions
- Carpenter v. Cimarron Hydrocarbons Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- Director, State Employees Workers' Compensation Division v. EvansTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Strackbein v. PrewittTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Baker v. GoldsmithTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Smith v. Babcock & Wilcox Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
394 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.