Legal Opinion

Lopez v. Lopez

Texas Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1988No. C-7226PublishedCited by 185 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue of concern in this appeal is whether a defendant, who is not notified of a trial setting and consequently does not appear, must nevertheless set up a meritorious defense in order to obtain a new trial. In an unpublished opinion, the court of appeals has held that regardless of the reason for defendant’s failure to appear or answer, the requirements of Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc., 134 Tex. 388, 393, 133 S.W.2d 124, 126 (1939), must be served. One such requirement is that the defendant support his motion for new trial with an affidavit which factually sets up a meritorious…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Peralta v. Heights Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Cliff v. HugginsTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Grissom v. WatsonTexas Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by185 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Falcon Ridge Apartments, Joint VentureTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Mathis v. LockwoodTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Bank One, Texas, N.A. v. MoodyTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. LBL Oil Co. v. International Power Services, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Estate of Pollack v. McMurreyTexas Supreme Court · 1993

180 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API