Legal Opinion

Arthaud v. Griffin

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 26, 1926PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Faville. J.

•The facts in this ease appear without dispute. Appellant is an attorney, regularly engaged in practice as such, in the state of Missouri. W. M. Wilson is an attorney resident at Indianola, in this state, and duly admitted to the practice of law. Wilson had been previously associated with appellant in conducting a certain lawsuit in the district court of Warren County, Iowa. .On the 8th day of August, 1925, Wilson filed in the office of the clerk of the district court of Warren County, Iowa, the petition in this cause, and at the same time delivered a copy of the petition to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Groves v. County Court of Grant CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Philbrook v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. May v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
  4. Hightower v. HawthornSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1826

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Metz v. Amoco Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  2. In Re the Unauthorized Practice of Law of EllisHawaii Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Bump v. BarnettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  4. In Re Contempt Proceeding of SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Bay County Bar Ass'n v. Finance System, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API