In Re Contempt Proceeding of Smith
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUSKINS, Justice.
In disposing of this case, we reach only one of the issues raised in the Court of Appeals, viz: May a judge in his discretion waive the requirement of local counsel found in G.S. 84-4.1(5) when an out-of-state attorney is admitted to limited practice in this State? Our answer to this question makes it unnecessary to consider other holdings and dicta of the Court of Appeals. We hold a trial judge cannot waive the requirement that local counsel be associated before an out-of-state attorney is admitted to limited practice in the courts of this State.
As a general rule, a…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Leis v. FlyntSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. BallanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- State v. . BallanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Martin v. WaltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In Re Attorney Discipline SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Couch v. Private Diagnostic ClinicCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Sisk v. Transylvania Community Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. KeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Matter of WhartonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.