Philbrook v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Petition in the Supreme Court for writ of mandate to the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. A. A. Sanderson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Samuel W. Latz commenced an action in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco against Louisa A. G-reenhood, executrix, appearing therein in person and not by attorney. After this action was at issue and ready for trial Horace W. Philbrook, petitioner herein, presented to the judge of the court a written transfer and assignment by Latz to himself of Latz’ interest and cause of action in said suit, and applied to the court for an order substituting himself in place of Latz as plaintiff therein.
In response to this application an order was made as permitted by the code,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Giselman v. StarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- In re Disbarment of PhilbrookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by12 opinions
- Greco v. Oregon Mutual Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Black v. DonelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Baba v. BOARD OF SUP'RS OF SAN FRANCISCOCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Iowa & California Land Co. v. HoagCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Arthaud v. GriffinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.