Legal Opinion

Metz v. Amoco Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 1, 1998No. 96-1485PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Justice.

Withdrawal of counsel can wreak havoc on the orderly processing of cases in a busy trial court, and it seems that a withdrawal is most likely to occur in civil eases where extremely complicated litigation is also unpromising for one side or the other. Retaining counsel on a continuing basis in such a suit is often problematic and frustrating to a litigant. It can also be frustrating to a trial judge, hard pressed in the important task of moving cases toward resolution. An especially critical point is reached when the fear arises that some tactical advantage is sought by way of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Devine Ex Rel. Devine v. Indian River County School BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. Robert MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Sun Valley Iowa Lake Ass'n v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  4. Johnston Equipment Corp. of Iowa v. Industrial IndemnitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  5. Donovan v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Meier v. SENECAUT IIISupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  2. Raper v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  3. State of Iowa v. Bradley Steven GrahamSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  4. In the Interest of K.N.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  5. Yulin Li ex rel. Lee v. RizzioCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2011

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API