Legal Opinion

Bump v. Barnett

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 12, 1944No. 46604PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Plaintiffs are Iowa lawyers composing a “Committee of the Unauthorized Practice of Law” of the Polk County Bar Association. Defendant, admittedly not a lawyer, is alleged to be conducting a business and performing acts which constitute the unauthorized practice of law. The record does not set out the evidence but shows instead the trial court’s findings of facts. The parties stipulate the record, as presented, to be all that is necessary for the purpose of the appeal.

• The findings recite: That defendant advertised, under the trade name “Public Service, W. Thomas Barnett, Manager,” that he…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. C. S. Dudley & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  2. State Ex Rel. v. Retail Credit Men's Ass'nTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Depew v. Wichita Ass'n of Credit MenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  4. Barngrover v. PettigrewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  5. Bump v. District Court of Polk CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Norvell v. Credit Bureau of Albuquerque, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  2. J. H. Marshall & Associates, Inc. v. BurlesonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. State Ex Rel. Frieson v. IsnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  5. McCann v. Iowa Mutual Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API