Legal Opinion
Brouillard v. Connecticut Siting Council
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 28, 2012No. AC 32846PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROBINSON, J.
The plaintiff, Claude M. Brouillard, appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the motions to dismiss filed by the defendants, Connecticut Siting Council (siting council) and Célico Partnership doing business as Verizon Wireless (Célico). On appeal, the plaintiff contends that the court erred in dismissing his action upon a determination that he was neither statutorily nor classically aggrieved. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The plaintiff appealed to the Superior Court on October 2, 2009, from the decision of the siting council granting a certificate…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Morrissey v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Brown and Brown, Inc. v. BlumenthalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- C. R. Klewin Northeast, LLC v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Stebbins v. Doncasters, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Naier v. BeckensteinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mayer v. Historic Dist. Comm'n of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Emerick v. Town of GlastonburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Citizens Against Overhead Power Line Construction v. Connecticut Siting CouncilConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Taylor v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Citizens Against Overhead Power Line Construction v. Connecticut Siting CouncilConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.