Legal Opinion
Brown and Brown, Inc. v. Blumenthal
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 10, 2010No. SC 18334PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROGERS, C. J.
The principal issue in this appeal 1 is the scope of the confidentiality protections afforded by General Statutes § 35-42, 2 a provision that authorizes
the attorney general to demand, prior to the institution of any action or proceeding, discovery from any person 3 whom he has reason to believe has violated any portion of the Connecticut Antitrust Act (antitrust act), General Statutes §§ 35-24 through 35-49. 4 The plaintiff, 5 Brown and Brown, Inc., appeals from the summary judgment of the trial court, rendered in favor of the defendant, Richard Blumenthal, in his official…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Westport Taxi Service, Inc. v. Westport Transit DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Vacco v. Microsoft Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Wiseman v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- McCoy v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- State v. B.BSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- State v. BBSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Vidiaki, LLC v. Just Breakfast & Things!!! LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. NavinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.