Stebbins v. Doncasters, Inc.

Opinion

The plaintiffs,1 individual employees of the defendant, Doncasters, Inc., appeal2 from the trial court’s summary judgment determining that the plaintiffs’ complaint alleging wilful misconduct and intentional acts in subjecting the plaintiffs to hazardous working conditions was barred by the exclusivity provision of the Workers’ Compensation Act (act), General Statutes § 31-284.3 The plaintiffs contend that the trial *233court improperly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment because their claims fall within the exception to the exclusivity statute enunciated in Suarez v.…