Legal Opinion
Naier v. Beckenstein
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 27, 2011No. AC 30148PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEACH, J.
The principal proposition presented in this appeal is whether a beneficiary of a trust has standing to maintain an action claiming impropriety on the part of a third party who settled a prior case with the trustee. On the facts presented in this matter, we hold that the beneficiary does not have such standing.
The plaintiffs, Jeffrey Naier and Andrea Naier, both individually and in their capacities as co-trustees of the Eleanor Naier revocable trust, appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their complaint against the defendants, Roz-Lynn Beckenstein, individually…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ganim v. Smith & Wesson Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Gold v. RowlandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Thomas v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Palmer v. Hartford National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Preston v. PrestonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fountain Pointe, LLC v. CalpitanoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Brouillard v. Connecticut Siting CouncilConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Browning v. BruntSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Heinonen v. GuptonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Lackman v. McAnultySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.