Legal Opinion

Steele v. Breinholt

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided December 21, 1987No. 860321-CAPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BENCH, Judge:

Plaintiff appeals the dismissal of her complaint for no cause of action. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

Just past noon on October 22, 1984, plaintiff Vietta Steele and her husband entered defendant Aspen Care Center (the Center), a privately owned and operated skilled nursing home facility, to visit an old friend, Zenon Dompor. Jolene Andersen, a social worker at the Center, told plaintiff she must leave as there was a restraining order in effect prohibiting her presence in the Center. Plaintiff asked to see the order. A restraining order did not, in fact, exist.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Scharf v. BMG Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Groen v. Tri-O-Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Gonzales v. MorrisUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Hillier v. LambornCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
  5. Faulkner v. FarnsworthUtah Supreme Court · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hornsby v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day SaintsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  2. State v. TolmanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  3. Onyeabor v. Pro Roofing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  4. Salt Lake City v. GrotepasCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  5. Commercial Investment Corp. v. SiggardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API