Legal Opinion

Hornsby v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided July 26, 1988No. 880031-CAPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BENCH, Judge:

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of no cause of action entered on a special jury verdict. Because the trial court improperly limited voir dire of the jury panel, we vacate the judgment and remand the case for a new trial.

On March 30, 1983, defendants Charles Giblett, a farmer for defendant Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (L.D.S. Church), and John Sutton were attempting to load into a horse trailer two cows owned by the L.D.S. Church. Approximately one month earlier, the two cows had crossed the fences separating…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Hayes v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. State v. BishopUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Casey v. Roman Catholic ArchbishopCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  5. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Congregation of the Passion, Holy Cross Province v. Touche Ross & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  2. Barcai v. BetweeHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Barrett v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
  4. Broberg v. HessCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  5. State v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API