Legal Opinion

Groen v. Tri-O-Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1983No. 17684PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OAKS, Justice:

This is an action for personal injury and property damage sustained in a helicopter crash. Judgment was entered on a special verdict for the defendant. On appeal, plaintiffs contend that (1) the verdict of no negligence was not supported by the evidence, (2) the jury was guilty of misconduct, and (3) the district court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on implied and express warranties of fitness.

Defendant Tri-O-Inc. (Tri-O) is an electrical contractor. At the time of the accident, it had a contract to erect electrical towers and string power line in Colorado. It was…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Prier v. Refrigeration Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Petersen v. Hubschman Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Aced v. Hobbs-Sesack Plumbing Co.California Supreme Court · 1961

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. CBS Inc. v. Ziff-Davis Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. SME Industries, Inc. v. Thompson, Ventulett, Stainback & Associates, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. RussellUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Gleave v. Denver & Rio Grande Western RailroadCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  5. State v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1992

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API